
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5222
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +57.6% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 105W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Gold 5222 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5222 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5222
2019Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,348 vs 14,397).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon Gold 5222
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +57.6% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 105W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Gold 5222 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+37.5% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5222 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,348 vs 14,397).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon Gold 5222?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 87 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 234 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon Gold 5222

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon Gold 5222
Xeon Gold 5222
The Xeon Gold 5222 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 9,348 points. Launch price was $1,221.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5222 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5222 — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5222 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon Gold 5222's 9,348 — a 42.5% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5222.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+26% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16.5 MB+38% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4 MB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,397+54% | 9,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 5222 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5222). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Gold 5222 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Gold 5222 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












