
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon Phi 7290
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 245W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Phi 7290 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 17,839).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Phi 7290
2016Why buy it
- ✅+23.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌157.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon Phi 7290
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 245W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Phi 7290 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+23.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 288 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 17,839).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Phi 7290, which brings 72 cores / 288 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon Phi 7290 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌157.9% higher power demand at 245W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon Phi 7290?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 434 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 394 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 420 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon Phi 7290

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290
The Xeon Phi 7290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Knights Landing (2016) architecture. It features 72 cores and 288 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 245 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,839 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Phi 7290 offers 72 cores / 288 threads — the Xeon Phi 7290 has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 1.7 GHz on the Xeon Phi 7290 — a 97% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses Knights Landing (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon Phi 7290's 17,839 — a 21.4% lead for the Xeon Phi 7290. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 0 kB (total) on the Xeon Phi 7290.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 72 / 288+800% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+188% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+140% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 0 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Knights Landing (2016) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 17,839+24% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Phi 7290 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon Phi 7290). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Phi 7290 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon Phi 7290 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












