PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,560 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
✅Delivers 342.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 300W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 50,189).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅400% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌215.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 95W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,560 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
✅Delivers 342.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $5,945 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 300W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅400% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ across 30 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 50,189).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 60 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8562Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($5,945 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌215.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 95W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ better than Core i7-9700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.9% more average FPS across 30 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the better fit. You are getting 248.6% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is 1444.2% more expensive on MSRP at $5,945 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 342.9% better value on paper (37.4 vs 8.4 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 400% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
1080p
low	308 FPS	187 FPS
medium	278 FPS	163 FPS
high	231 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	154 FPS
medium	221 FPS	129 FPS
high	178 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	70 FPS
medium	140 FPS	62 FPS
high	108 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
1080p
low	360 FPS	542 FPS
medium	321 FPS	485 FPS
high	291 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	360 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	473 FPS
medium	282 FPS	423 FPS
high	258 FPS	363 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	303 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	295 FPS
medium	221 FPS	266 FPS
high	208 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	218 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
1080p
low	360 FPS	920 FPS
medium	360 FPS	832 FPS
high	360 FPS	771 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	679 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	791 FPS
medium	360 FPS	712 FPS
high	360 FPS	655 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	584 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	524 FPS
medium	360 FPS	440 FPS
high	360 FPS	393 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	327 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
1080p
low	360 FPS	948 FPS
medium	360 FPS	853 FPS
high	360 FPS	739 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	642 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	779 FPS
medium	360 FPS	682 FPS
high	360 FPS	588 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	505 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	569 FPS
medium	360 FPS	510 FPS
high	360 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	388 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon Platinum 8562Y+

The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,189 points. Launch price was $5,945.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+'s 50,189 — a 110.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	32 / 64+300%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+20%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+29%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	60 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+700%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	14,397	50,189+249%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+) — the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8562Y+).

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Socket	LGA1151	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	5600+139900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+3276700%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	80+400%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ rivals EPYC 9474F.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon Platinum 8562Y+
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ debuted at $5945. On MSRP ($385 vs $5945), the Core i7-9700K is $5560 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8562Y+ — making the Core i7-9700K the 126.3% better value option.