
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1290E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon W-1290E needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,060).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290E, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon W-1290E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-1290E
2020Why buy it
- ✅+32.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon W-1290E
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon W-1290E needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+32.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,060).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290E, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon W-1290E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1290E better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 331 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 361 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-1290E

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon W-1290E
Xeon W-1290E
The Xeon W-1290E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 13 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,060 points. Launch price was $552.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-1290E offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-1290E — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1290E uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon W-1290E's 19,060 — a 27.9% lead for the Xeon W-1290E. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290E.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 19,060+32% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1290E uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon W-1290E). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon W-1290E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-1290E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












