
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2170B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon W-2170B needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2170B across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,448).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2170B, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon W-2170B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon W-2170B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60.4% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon W-2170B
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon W-2170B needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.6% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60.4% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2170B across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,448).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 19 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2170B, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon W-2170B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2170B better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 178 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 557 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 611 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 410 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon W-2170B

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon W-2170B
Xeon W-2170B
The Xeon W-2170B is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,448 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-2170B offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2170B has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2170B — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-2170B uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon W-2170B's 24,448 — a 51.7% lead for the Xeon W-2170B. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2170B.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+14% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 19.25 MB (total)+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 24,448+70% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2170B uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon W-2170B). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon W-2170B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon W-2170B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












