PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,617 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Delivers 556.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 5.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $5,002 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 205W, a 110W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon W-3245M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 28,494).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 22 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3245M, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($5,002 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌115.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 95W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3245M better than Core i7-9700K?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3245M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3245M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3245M is the stronger fit. You are getting 97.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3245M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon W-3245M comes in 1199.2% more expensive on MSRP at $5,002 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 556.4% better value on paper (37.4 vs 5.7 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3245M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018), 83.3% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 65.7% lead for the Xeon W-3245M. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+7%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	22 MB+83%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+1500%	16 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	14,397	28,494+98%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,474
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,572

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M — the Xeon W-3245M supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon W-3245M
Socket	LGA1151	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	64+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3245M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245M). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon W-3245M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Desktop	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Xeon W-3245M came in at $5002. On launch pricing ($385 vs $5002), Core i7-9700K was $4617 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 5.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245M — making the Core i7-9700K the 147.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon W-3245M
MSRP	$385-92%	$5002
Performance per Dollar	37.4+556%	5.7
Release Date	2018	2019

Search Core i7-9700K on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3245M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.