Core i7-9700K
Xeon w5-3525
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon w5-3525 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon w5-3525 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon w5-3525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $954 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 290W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon w5-3525 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3525 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 45,311).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3525, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w5-3525
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅600% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($1,339 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌205.3% higher power demand at 290W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w5-3525 better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon w5-3525 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.
Xeon w5-3525
The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon w5-3525 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon w5-3525 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon w5-3525's 45,311 — a 103.6% lead for the Xeon w5-3525. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 45 MB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 45,311+215% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 — the Xeon w5-3525 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3525 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3525). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3525) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 96 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and W790 (Xeon w5-3525).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 4800+80% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 112+600% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-3525 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon w5-3525 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Xeon w5-3525 came in at $1339. On launch pricing ($385 vs $1339), Core i7-9700K was $954 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3525 — making the Core i7-9700K the 10% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon w5-3525 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-71% | $1339 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+11% | 33.8 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-9700K and Xeon w5-3525
