
Core i7-9700KF
Popular choices:

Core i9-10900TE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700KF
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 45.8 PassMark/$ ($374 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Core i9-10900TE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $65 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $374 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.8 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $374 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700KF across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,159 vs 14,250).
Core i7-9700KF
2019Core i9-10900TE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $65 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $374 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.8 vs 38.1 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $374 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 45.8 PassMark/$ ($374 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700KF across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,159 vs 14,250).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700KF better than Core i9-10900TE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700KF | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 334 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 219 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700KF | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 104 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700KF | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 345 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 349 FPS | 254 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700KF | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 356 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700KF and Core i9-10900TE

Core i7-9700KF
Core i7-9700KF
The Core i7-9700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 14,250 points. Launch price was $374.

Core i9-10900TE
Core i9-10900TE
The Core i9-10900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,159 points. Launch price was $488.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700KF packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-10900TE offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-10900TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700KF versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-10900TE — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700KF (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700KF uses the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-10900TE uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700KF scores 14,250 against the Core i9-10900TE's 14,159 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-9700KF. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700KF vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900TE.
| Feature | Core i7-9700KF | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+9% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+100% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,250 | 14,159 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,659 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,072 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700KF uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-10900TE uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700KF | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700KF) / not specified (Core i9-10900TE).
| Feature | Core i7-9700KF | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700KF launched at $374 MSRP, while the Core i9-10900TE debuted at $309. On MSRP ($374 vs $309), the Core i9-10900TE is $65 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700KF delivers 38.1 pts/$ vs 45.8 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900TE — making the Core i9-10900TE the 18.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700KF | Core i9-10900TE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $374 | $309-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.1 | 45.8+20% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












