Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 7 7445HS

Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 7 7445HS Performance Spectrum

Core i9-10900

10 / 20

19,163

+0.8%

19,008

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 7 7445HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 7 7445HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-10900

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $483 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7445HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,008 vs 19,163).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-10900 better than Ryzen 7 7445HS?

Yes. Core i9-10900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 22.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-10900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 22.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-10900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-10900 is the better buy right now. Core i9-10900 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $483 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 22.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (39.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7445HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-10900 vs Ryzen 7 7445HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10900

The Core i9-10900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,163 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen 7 7445HS

The Ryzen 7 7445HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP7r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 19,008 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-10900 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 7445HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-10900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10900 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7445HS — a 8.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-10900 uses the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10900 scores 19,163 against the Ryzen 7 7445HS's 19,008 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10900. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 7445HS.

Feature	Core i9-10900	Ryzen 7 7445HS
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+67%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+9%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+25%	16 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Comet Lake (2020−2025)	Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark	19,163	19,008

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-10900 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7445HS uses FP7/FP7r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.