
Core i9-10910

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Core i9-10910 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10910 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10910 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10910
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Draws 3W instead of 6W, a 4W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $488 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
2023Why buy it
- β Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
- β 25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10910 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (21,287 vs 21,396).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- β140% higher power demand at 6W vs 2.5W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-10910 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10910 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10910
The Core i9-10910 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 May 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 21,396 points. Launch price was $488.


Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MBΒ +Β 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x-7500, DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,287 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10910 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core i9-10910 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-10910 versus 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U β a 2% clock advantage for the Core i9-10910 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-10910 uses the Comet Lake-S (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10910 scores 21,396 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U's 21,287 β a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-10910. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Core i9-10910 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U.
| Feature | Core i9-10910 | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+2% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB+25% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB | 6 MB+140% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake-S (2020) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 21,396 | 21,287 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10910 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10910 versus 5600 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U β the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-10910) vs 20 (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U) β the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i9-10910 | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | 5600+91% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10910) vs true (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics 630 (Core i9-10910) and Radeon 760M (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-10910 | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon 760M |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












