
Core i9-10920X

Ryzen 7 250
Core i9-10920X vs Ryzen 7 250 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-10920X vs Ryzen 7 250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-10920X vs Ryzen 7 250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-10920X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (19 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 250 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $689 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌489.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 250 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 250
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 165W, a 137W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,677 vs 25,875).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 19 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 250 better than Core i9-10920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-10920X vs Ryzen 7 250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-10920X
The Core i9-10920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,875 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 250
The Ryzen 7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,677 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-10920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 250 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-10920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10920X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 250 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 250 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-10920X uses the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 250 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-10920X scores 25,875 against the Ryzen 7 250's 25,677 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10920X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10920X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 250.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+50% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+6% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total)+20% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake-X (2019) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,875 | 25,677 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 15,458 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,250 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-10920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 250 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 44 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-10920X) / not specified (Ryzen 7 250). Primary use case: Core i9-10920X targets HEDT/Workstation.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | HEDT/Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-10920X was priced at $689, while the Ryzen 7 250 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($689 vs $0), Ryzen 7 250 was $689 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i9-10920X | Ryzen 7 250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $689 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.6 | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














