PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700H vs Core i9-10920X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700H vs Core i9-10920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+24.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 19 MB).
✅Costs $187 less on MSRP ($502 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.1 vs 37.6 PassMark/$ ($502 MSRP vs $689 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i9-10920X

2019

Why buy it

✅57.1% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,458 vs 20,101).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 24 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.6 vs 52.1 PassMark/$ ($689 MSRP vs $502 MSRP).
❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700H better than Core i9-10920X?

Yes. Core i7-13700H is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 30% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700H is the stronger fit. You are getting 30% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 24.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 19 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700H is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700H comes in $187 cheaper on MSRP at $502 MSRP versus $689 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 38.7% better value on MSRP (52.1 vs 37.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of LGA2066, 24.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 19 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 12/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700H vs Core i9-10920X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700H

The Core i7-13700H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,140 points. Launch price was $502.

Core i9-10920X

The Core i9-10920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-X (2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,875 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i9-10920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700H versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-10920X — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-10920X uses Cascade Lake-X (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700H scores 26,140 against the Core i9-10920X's 25,875 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-13700H. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 20,101 vs 15,458 (26.1% advantage for the Core i7-13700H). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,279 vs 1,250, a 58.3% lead for the Core i7-13700H that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,208 vs 12,000 (9.6% advantage for the Core i7-13700H). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700H vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-10920X.

Feature	Core i7-13700H	Core i9-10920X
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+25%	19.25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Cascade Lake-X (2019)
PassMark	26,140+1%	25,875
Cinebench R23 Multi	20,101+30%	15,458
Geekbench 6 Single	2,279+82%	1,250
Geekbench 6 Multi	13,208+10%	12,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10920X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i7-13700H versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10920X — the Core i7-13700H supports 77.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-10920X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700H) vs 4 (Core i9-10920X). PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i7-13700H) vs 44 (Core i9-10920X) — the Core i9-10920X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700H) and X299 (Core i9-10920X).

Feature	Core i7-13700H	Core i9-10920X
Socket	FCBGA1744	LGA2066
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+77%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	96 GB	256 GB+167%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	28	44+57%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700H) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-10920X). The Core i7-13700H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)), while the Core i9-10920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-10920X targets HEDT/Workstation.

Feature	Core i7-13700H	Core i9-10920X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	HEDT/Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700H was priced at $502, while the Core i9-10920X came in at $689. On launch pricing ($502 vs $689), Core i7-13700H was $187 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700H delivers 52.1 pts/$ vs 37.6 pts/$ for the Core i9-10920X — making the Core i7-13700H the 32.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700H	Core i9-10920X
MSRP	$502-27%	$689
Performance per Dollar	52.1+39%	37.6
Release Date	2023	2019

Search Core i7-13700H on Amazon

Search Core i9-10920X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.