
Core i7-13700H

EPYC 7451
Core i7-13700H vs EPYC 7451 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700H vs EPYC 7451 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700H vs EPYC 7451: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96EU), while EPYC 7451 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,140 vs 26,639).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7451, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $502 MSRP, while EPYC 7451 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7451
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700H better than EPYC 7451?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700H vs EPYC 7451 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700H
The Core i7-13700H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,140 points. Launch price was $502.

EPYC 7451
The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7451 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700H versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7451 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700H scores 26,140 against the EPYC 7451's 26,639 — a 1.9% lead for the EPYC 7451. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700H vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | EPYC 7451 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 24 / 48+71% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+56% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+4% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 26,140 | 26,639+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,101 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,279 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,208 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7451 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | EPYC 7451 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700H) / not specified (EPYC 7451). The Core i7-13700H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)), while the EPYC 7451 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | EPYC 7451 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96EU) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















