
Core i7-13700H

Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
Core i7-13700H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +21.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96EU), while Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.1 vs 86.8 PassMark/$ ($502 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
2022Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $202 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $502 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 66.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.8 vs 52.1 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $502 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,054 vs 26,140).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 5845?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700H
The Core i7-13700H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,140 points. Launch price was $502.


Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 26,054 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700H scores 26,140 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845's 26,054 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-13700H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700H vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 26,140 | 26,054 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,101 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,279 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,208 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700H) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 5845). The Core i7-13700H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96EU) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700H was priced at $502, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($502 vs $300), Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 was $202 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700H delivers 52.1 pts/$ vs 86.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 the 50.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $502 | $300-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.1 | 86.8+67% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














