
Core i9-11900K

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-11900K
2021Why buy it
- β Costs $110 less on MSRP ($539 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- β Delivers 19.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.4 vs 38.7 PassMark/$ ($539 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- β Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (24,990 vs 25,148).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +15.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 38.7 vs 46.4 PassMark/$ ($649 MSRP vs $539 MSRP).
- β44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2920X better than Core i9-11900K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-11900K vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11900K
The Core i9-11900K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,990 points. Launch price was $539.


Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018β2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.
Processing Power
The Core i9-11900K packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-11900K versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X β a 18.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-11900K (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-11900K uses the Rocket Lake (2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018β2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11900K scores 24,990 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 β a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-11900K vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Core i9-11900K | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+21% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 32 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Rocket Lake (2021) | ZEN+ (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 24,990 | 25,148 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11900K uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11900K | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-11900K was priced at $539, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X came in at $649. On launch pricing ($539 vs $649), Core i9-11900K was $110 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-11900K delivers 46.4 pts/$ vs 38.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X β making the Core i9-11900K the 17.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-11900K | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $539-17% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.4+20% | 38.7 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














