Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-13900TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-13900TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-13900TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11950H

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-13900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i9-13900TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while Core i9-11950H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,602 vs 20,699).
❌Launch MSRP is still $554 MSRP, while Core i9-11950H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900TE better than Core i9-11950H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-13900TE is ahead with a 18.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11950H pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core i9-13900TE also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-11950H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900TE is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $554 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i9-11950H is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1787, and 50% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-11950H vs Core i9-13900TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11950H

The Core i9-11950H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,699 points. Launch price was $556.

Core i9-13900TE

The Core i9-13900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,602 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-11950H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i9-13900TE offers 24 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900TE has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-11950H versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-13900TE — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Core i9-11950H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i9-13900TE uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11950H scores 20,699 against the Core i9-13900TE's 20,602 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-11950H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11950H vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900TE.

Feature	Core i9-11950H	Core i9-13900TE
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 32+200%
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+110%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	36 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+60%
Process	10 nm SuperFin	10 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	20,699	20,602

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11950H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-13900TE uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-11950H	Core i9-13900TE
Socket	FCBGA1787	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-11950H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-13900TE). The Core i9-13900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i9-11950H requires a dedicated GPU.