Core i9-11950H vs EPYC 7262

Core i9-11950H vs EPYC 7262 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-11950H

8 / 16

20,699

0.0%

20,779

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-11950H vs EPYC 7262 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-11950H vs EPYC 7262: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-11950H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 155W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (20,699 vs 20,779).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7262, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7262

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-11950H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌342.9% higher power demand at 155W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-11950H better than EPYC 7262?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7262 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-11950H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7262 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-11950H still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-11950H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-11950H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-11950H vs EPYC 7262 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11950H

The Core i9-11950H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,699 points. Launch price was $556.

EPYC 7262

The EPYC 7262 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,779 points. Launch price was $575.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i9-11950H and EPYC 7262 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-11950H versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7262 — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-11950H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i9-11950H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the EPYC 7262 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11950H scores 20,699 against the EPYC 7262's 20,779 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7262. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11950H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7262.

Feature	Core i9-11950H	EPYC 7262
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz+47%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	7 nm, 14 nm-30%
Architecture	Tiger Lake-H (2021)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	20,699	20,779
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	11,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,346
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	7,900

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-11950H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7262 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-11950H	EPYC 7262
Socket	FCBGA1787	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	—	4096 GB
RAM Channels	—	8
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	128

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-11950H) / AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7262). Primary use case: EPYC 7262 targets Budget Server / Multi-thread computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 7262 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.