
Core i9-11950H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7735U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-11950H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7735U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7735U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,524 vs 20,699).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Core i9-11950H
2021Ryzen 7 7735U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7735U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735U moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,524 vs 20,699).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7735U better than Core i9-11950H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-11950H | Ryzen 7 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 193 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-11950H | Ryzen 7 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 293 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 282 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 227 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-11950H | Ryzen 7 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 437 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-11950H | Ryzen 7 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 476 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 510 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 348 FPS | 372 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-11950H and Ryzen 7 7735U

Core i9-11950H
Core i9-11950H
The Core i9-11950H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 20,699 points. Launch price was $556.


Ryzen 7 7735U
Ryzen 7 7735U
The Ryzen 7 7735U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,524 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-11950H and Ryzen 7 7735U share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-11950H versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735U — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-11950H (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-11950H uses the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 7 7735U uses Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-11950H scores 20,699 against the Ryzen 7 7735U's 20,524 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-11950H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11950H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735U.
| Feature | Core i9-11950H | Ryzen 7 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+5% | 4.75 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.7 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin | 6 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Rembrandt-U Refresh (2023) |
| PassMark | 20,699 | 20,524 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11950H uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11950H | Ryzen 7 7735U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












