
Core i9-11980HK

Xeon W-2255
Core i9-11980HK vs Xeon W-2255 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-11980HK vs Xeon W-2255 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-11980HK vs Xeon W-2255: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-11980HK
2021Why buy it
- ✅+24.7% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 165W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 32EUs, while Xeon W-2255 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Xeon W-2255.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2255 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,244 vs 22,504).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2255, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon W-2255
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $778 MSRP, while Core i9-11980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-11980HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-11980HK.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2255 better than Core i9-11980HK?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-11980HK vs Xeon W-2255 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-11980HK
The Core i9-11980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-HK (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,244 points. Launch price was $583.

Xeon W-2255
The Xeon W-2255 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,504 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i9-11980HK packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2255 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-2255 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-11980HK versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-2255 — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-11980HK (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-11980HK is built on the Tiger Lake-HK (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i9-11980HK scores 22,244 against the Xeon W-2255's 22,504 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon W-2255. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-11980HK vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2255.
| Feature | Core i9-11980HK | Xeon W-2255 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+6% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+25% | 19.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm SuperFin-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Tiger Lake-HK (2021) | — |
| PassMark | 22,244 | 22,504+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,029 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,129 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,766 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-11980HK uses the FCBGA1787 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2255 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-11980HK | Xeon W-2255 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1787 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-11980HK) / not specified (Xeon W-2255). The Core i9-11980HK includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 32EUs), while the Xeon W-2255 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-11980HK targets Enthusiast Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-11980HK rivals Ryzen 9 5900HX.
| Feature | Core i9-11980HK | Xeon W-2255 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 32EUs | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













