
Core i9-12900HK

Ryzen 5 7400F
Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen 5 7400F Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen 5 7400F FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen 5 7400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-12900HK
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs), while Ryzen 5 7400F needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 5 7400F.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,512 vs 25,529).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 5 7400F
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900HK across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i9-12900HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-12900HK.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7400F better than Core i9-12900HK?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen 5 7400F Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900HK
The Core i9-12900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,512 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 7400F
The Ryzen 5 7400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,529 points. Launch price was $229.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-12900HK has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900HK versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400F — a 6.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900HK (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-12900HK uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7400F uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900HK scores 25,512 against the Ryzen 5 7400F's 25,529 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 5 7400F. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900HK vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400F.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 5 7400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+133% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+6% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-H (2022) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 25,512 | 25,529 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,197 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,938 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,317 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 7400F uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 5 7400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-12900HK) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7400F). The Core i9-12900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs)), while the Ryzen 5 7400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900HK targets Enthusiast Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900HK rivals Ryzen 9 6900HX.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 5 7400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













