
Core i9-12900HK
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-12900HK
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs), while Ryzen 7 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 8840HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 25,512).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-12900HK.
Core i9-12900HK
2022Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs), while Ryzen 7 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 8840HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 25,512).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-12900HK.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than Core i9-12900HK?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 257 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 458 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 418 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 549 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 414 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 616 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 462 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 554 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 498 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 638 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 629 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 638 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 638 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 476 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 368 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900HK and Ryzen 7 8840HS

Core i9-12900HK
Core i9-12900HK
The Core i9-12900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,512 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900HK has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900HK versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-12900HK uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900HK scores 25,512 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i9-12900HK. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900HK vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.1 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-H (2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 25,512+1% | 25,156 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,197 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,938 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,317 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-12900HK) / not specified (Ryzen 7 8840HS). The Core i9-12900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs)), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900HK targets Enthusiast Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900HK rivals Ryzen 9 6900HX.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












