Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen 7 8840HS

Intel

Core i9-12900HK

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HS

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i9-12900HK

2022

Why buy it

  • +1.4% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs), while Ryzen 7 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 8840HS.

Trade-offs

  • 60.7% higher power demand at 45W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 8840HS

2023

Why buy it

  • Draws 28W instead of 45W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 25,512).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-12900HK.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8840HS better than Core i9-12900HK?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 8840HS is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900HK pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. Core i9-12900HK also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900HK is the better fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 8840HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 7 8840HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 8840HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i9-12900HKRyzen 7 8840HS
1080p
low267 FPS255 FPS
medium257 FPS235 FPS
high213 FPS198 FPS
ultra183 FPS170 FPS
1440p
low229 FPS227 FPS
medium197 FPS189 FPS
high159 FPS154 FPS
ultra139 FPS136 FPS
4K
low159 FPS157 FPS
medium136 FPS133 FPS
high106 FPS103 FPS
ultra93 FPS91 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i9-12900HKRyzen 7 8840HS
1080p
low635 FPS469 FPS
medium539 FPS388 FPS
high458 FPS336 FPS
ultra418 FPS301 FPS
1440p
low549 FPS410 FPS
medium486 FPS358 FPS
high414 FPS310 FPS
ultra357 FPS265 FPS
4K
low324 FPS270 FPS
medium291 FPS247 FPS
high277 FPS234 FPS
ultra243 FPS202 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i9-12900HKRyzen 7 8840HS
1080p
low638 FPS629 FPS
medium616 FPS629 FPS
high545 FPS629 FPS
ultra462 FPS594 FPS
1440p
low638 FPS629 FPS
medium554 FPS622 FPS
high485 FPS525 FPS
ultra416 FPS451 FPS
4K
low498 FPS521 FPS
medium416 FPS458 FPS
high373 FPS406 FPS
ultra314 FPS345 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i9-12900HKRyzen 7 8840HS
1080p
low638 FPS629 FPS
medium638 FPS629 FPS
high638 FPS629 FPS
ultra604 FPS629 FPS
1440p
low638 FPS629 FPS
medium638 FPS629 FPS
high572 FPS629 FPS
ultra498 FPS548 FPS
4K
low525 FPS559 FPS
medium476 FPS501 FPS
high423 FPS446 FPS
ultra368 FPS384 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-12900HK and Ryzen 7 8840HS

Intel

Core i9-12900HK

The Core i9-12900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,512 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-12900HK has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900HK versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i9-12900HK uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900HK scores 25,512 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i9-12900HK. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900HK vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.

FeatureCore i9-12900HKRyzen 7 8840HS
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Alder Lake-H (2022)
Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark
25,512+1%
25,156
Cinebench R23 Multi
18,197
Geekbench 6 Single
1,938
Geekbench 6 Multi
13,317
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-12900HKRyzen 7 8840HS
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-12900HK) / not specified (Ryzen 7 8840HS). The Core i9-12900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs)), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900HK targets Enthusiast Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900HK rivals Ryzen 9 6900HX.

FeatureCore i9-12900HKRyzen 7 8840HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs)
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Enthusiast Gaming Laptop