
Core i9-12900HK

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-12900HK
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs), while Ryzen Threadripper 2920X needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,148 vs 25,512).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $649 MSRP, while Core i9-12900HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900HK moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-12900HK can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900HK better than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-12900HK vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900HK
The Core i9-12900HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,512 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900HK packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i9-12900HK has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900HK versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900HK (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-12900HK uses the Alder Lake-H (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900HK scores 25,512 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i9-12900HK. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900HK vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+16% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-H (2022) | ZEN+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 25,512+1% | 25,148 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,197 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,938 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,317 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900HK uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-12900HK) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 2920X). The Core i9-12900HK includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs)), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900HK targets Enthusiast Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900HK rivals Ryzen 9 6900HX.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HK | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics G7 (96EUs) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Gaming Laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













