
Core i9-12900HX

Xeon Gold 6240R
Core i9-12900HX vs Xeon Gold 6240R Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-12900HX vs Xeon Gold 6240R FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-12900HX vs Xeon Gold 6240R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-12900HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,838 less on MSRP ($606 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 299.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.5 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($606 MSRP vs $2,444 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 165W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6240R, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6240R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (22,500 vs 23,150).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($2,444 MSRP vs $606 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 165W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-12900HX better than Xeon Gold 6240R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-12900HX vs Xeon Gold 6240R Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900HX
The Core i9-12900HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 33,018 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6240R
The Xeon Gold 6240R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 33,353 points. Launch price was $2,200.
Processing Power
The Core i9-12900HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240R offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6240R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12900HX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240R — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900HX (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i9-12900HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900HX scores 33,018 against the Xeon Gold 6240R's 33,353 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6240R. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 23,150 vs 22,500 (2.8% advantage for the Core i9-12900HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,426 vs 1,212, a 66.7% lead for the Core i9-12900HX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,620 vs 17,218 (16.3% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6240R). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900HX vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240R.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HX | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+25% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+19% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 24 MB+1820% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-HX (2022) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 33,018 | 33,353+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 23,150+3% | 22,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,426+100% | 1,212 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,620 | 17,218+18% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-12900HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6240R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i9-12900HX versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6240R — the Core i9-12900HX supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6240R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-12900HX) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6240R). Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM670,WM690 (Core i9-12900HX) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6240R).
| Feature | Core i9-12900HX | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+64% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-12900HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6240R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i9-12900HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6240R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12900HX targets High-end Mobile Performance, Xeon Gold 6240R targets Server / High-load computing. Direct competitor: Core i9-12900HX rivals Ryzen 9 6900HX; Xeon Gold 6240R rivals EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HX | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-end Mobile Performance | Server / High-load computing |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-12900HX was priced at $606, while the Xeon Gold 6240R came in at $2444. On launch pricing ($606 vs $2444), Core i9-12900HX was $1838 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-12900HX delivers 54.5 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6240R — making the Core i9-12900HX the 119.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-12900HX | Xeon Gold 6240R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $606-75% | $2444 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.5+301% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















