Core i9-12900TE vs Xeon E5-2698 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-12900TE vs Xeon E5-2698 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-12900TE vs Xeon E5-2698 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-12900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 135W, a 100W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2698 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $494 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2698 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2698 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,764 vs 22,887).
❌285.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i9-12900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-12900TE better than Xeon E5-2698 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2698 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-12900TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-12900TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-12900TE is the better buy right now. Core i9-12900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $494 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (46.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-12900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-12900TE vs Xeon E5-2698 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12900TE

The Core i9-12900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,887 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2698 v4

The Xeon E5-2698 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 22,764 points. Launch price was $3,226.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-12900TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2698 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-12900TE versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2698 v4 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i9-12900TE (base: 1.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i9-12900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12900TE scores 22,887 against the Xeon E5-2698 v4's 22,764 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-12900TE. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12900TE vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2698 v4.

Feature	Core i9-12900TE	Xeon E5-2698 v4
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+33%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	50 MB+67%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	5 MB+300%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	22,887	22,764

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2698 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.