Core i9-12950HX vs EPYC 4245P

Core i9-12950HX vs EPYC 4245P Performance Spectrum

Core i9-12950HX

16 / 24

31,494

+1.2%

31,135

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-12950HX vs EPYC 4245P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-12950HX vs EPYC 4245P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-12950HX

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4245P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

EPYC 4245P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12950HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,000 vs 23,113).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-12950HX better than EPYC 4245P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4245P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-12950HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-12950HX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-12950HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 92.6% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-12950HX still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-12950HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4245P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-12950HX vs EPYC 4245P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-12950HX

The Core i9-12950HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,494 points. Launch price was $499.

EPYC 4245P

The EPYC 4245P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,135 points. Launch price was $239.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-12950HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 4245P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-12950HX has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-12950HX versus 5.4 GHz on the EPYC 4245P — a 7.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4245P (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i9-12950HX uses the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4245P uses Grado (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-12950HX scores 31,494 against the EPYC 4245P's 31,135 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-12950HX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 23,113 vs 12,000 (63.3% advantage for the Core i9-12950HX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,349 vs 3,347, a 35% lead for the EPYC 4245P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 15,711 vs 14,616 (7.2% advantage for the Core i9-12950HX). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i9-12950HX vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4245P.

Feature	Core i9-12950HX	EPYC 4245P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5.4 GHz+8%
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	3.9 GHz+70%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+25%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Alder Lake-HX (2022)	Grado (2025)
PassMark	31,494+1%	31,135
Cinebench R23 Multi	23,113+93%	12,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,349	3,347+42%
Geekbench 6 Multi	15,711+7%	14,616

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-12950HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4245P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i9-12950HX versus DDR5-5600 on the EPYC 4245P — the EPYC 4245P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4245P supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-12950HX) vs 24 (EPYC 4245P) — the EPYC 4245P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM670,WM690 (Core i9-12950HX) and AM5 platform (EPYC 4245P).

Feature	Core i9-12950HX	EPYC 4245P
Socket	FCBGA1964	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-12950HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4245P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-12950HX) vs AMD-V (EPYC 4245P). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-12950HX) and Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2) (EPYC 4245P) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12950HX targets Mobile Workstation Flagship, EPYC 4245P targets Entry-level Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i9-12950HX rivals Ryzen 9 6980HX; EPYC 4245P rivals Xeon E-2436.

Feature	Core i9-12950HX	EPYC 4245P
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2)
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Mobile Workstation Flagship	Entry-level Server / Workstation