
Core i7-13700HX
Popular choices:

Core i9-12950HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12950HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Core i9-12950HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i9-12950HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,494 vs 32,157).
Core i7-13700HX
2023Core i9-12950HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-12950HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Core i9-12950HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,494 vs 32,157).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Core i9-12950HX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700HX | Core i9-12950HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700HX | Core i9-12950HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 439 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700HX | Core i9-12950HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 590 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 372 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 373 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 314 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700HX | Core i9-12950HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 804 FPS | 787 FPS |
| medium | 804 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 715 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 635 FPS | 600 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 778 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 691 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 599 FPS | 569 FPS |
| ultra | 521 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 547 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 497 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 386 FPS | 366 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700HX and Core i9-12950HX

Core i7-13700HX
Core i7-13700HX
The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

Core i9-12950HX
Core i9-12950HX
The Core i9-12950HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-HX (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,494 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-13700HX and Core i9-12950HX share an identical 16-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 5 GHz on the Core i9-12950HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-12950HX uses Alder Lake-HX (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Core i9-12950HX's 31,494 — a 2.1% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. Both processors carry 30 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Core i9-12950HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Alder Lake-HX (2022) |
| PassMark | 32,157+2% | 31,494 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 23,113 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,349 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,711 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FCBGA1964 socket with PCIe 5.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i7-13700HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and HM670,WM690 (Core i9-12950HX).
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Core i9-12950HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i7-13700HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i9-12950HX). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i7-13700HX) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-12950HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-12950HX targets Mobile Workstation Flagship. Direct competitor: Core i9-12950HX rivals Ryzen 9 6980HX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Core i9-12950HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Mobile Workstation Flagship |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












