
Core i7-13700HX

Xeon Gold 6254
Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon Gold 6254 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon Gold 6254 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon Gold 6254: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+21.2% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 200W, a 145W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6254 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (32,157 vs 32,334).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6254, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6254 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6254
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌263.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Xeon Gold 6254?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon Gold 6254 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700HX
The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

Xeon Gold 6254
The Xeon Gold 6254 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 32,334 points. Launch price was $3,803.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6254 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6254 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6254 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6254 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Xeon Gold 6254's 32,334 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6254. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6254.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Xeon Gold 6254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 18 / 36+13% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+25% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz+48% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+21% | 24.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 18 MB+800% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 32,157 | 32,334 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,365 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,950 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6254 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13700HX versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6254 — the Core i7-13700HX supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6254 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6254). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6254) — the Xeon Gold 6254 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and C620 (Xeon Gold 6254).
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Xeon Gold 6254 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+64% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 1024 GB+433% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6254). The Core i7-13700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6254 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6254 targets Enterprise Server / Database. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6254 rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Xeon Gold 6254 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server / Database |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













