Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon Gold 5320H

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon Gold 5320H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon Gold 5320H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700HX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Xeon Gold 5320H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5320H, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5320H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Gold 5320H

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (31,718 vs 32,157).
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Xeon Gold 5320H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 5320H makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700HX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700HX is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at $485 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (66.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 20/40. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon Gold 5320H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700HX

The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

Xeon Gold 5320H

The Xeon Gold 5320H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 31,718 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5320H offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 5320H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5320H — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5320H uses Cooper Lake-SP (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Xeon Gold 5320H's 31,718 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 27.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5320H.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Xeon Gold 5320H
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	20 / 40+25%
Boost Clock	5 GHz+19%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+9%	27.5 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)	Cooper Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	32,157+1%	31,718
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	22,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,350
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5320H uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13700HX versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5320H — the Core i7-13700HX supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5320H supports up to 1120 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 483.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5320H). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5320H) — the Xeon Gold 5320H offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and C621A (Xeon Gold 5320H).

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Xeon Gold 5320H
Socket	FCBGA1964	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+80%	DDR4-2667
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1120 GB+483%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 5320H). The Core i7-13700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5320H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5320H targets High-density Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5320H rivals EPYC 7313.