
Core i7-13700HX

Xeon E-2488
Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon E-2488 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon E-2488 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon E-2488: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Xeon E-2488 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Xeon E-2488 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2488
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,888 vs 32,157).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Xeon E-2488?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700HX vs Xeon E-2488 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700HX
The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

Xeon E-2488
The Xeon E-2488 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 31,888 points. Launch price was $606.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E-2488 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 5.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2488 — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2488 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E-2488 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Xeon E-2488's 31,888 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2488.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.6 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+25% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 32,157 | 31,888 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E-2488 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i7-13700HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and W680 (Xeon E-2488).
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-13700HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E-2488). The Core i7-13700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon E-2488 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E-2488 targets Entry-level Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon E-2488 rivals Xeon E-2388G.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Xeon E-2488 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Entry-level Server / Workstation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













