
Core i7-13700HX

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700HX
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,314 less on MSRP ($485 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 273.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 66.3 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($485 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (31,945 vs 32,157).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 66.3 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $485 MSRP).
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700HX
The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.


Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX's 31,945 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+19% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 32,157 | 31,945 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 33,213 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13700HX versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — the Core i7-13700HX supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX).
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+64% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i7-13700HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). The Core i7-13700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Extreme Content Creation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700HX was priced at $485, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX came in at $1799. On launch pricing ($485 vs $1799), Core i7-13700HX was $1314 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700HX delivers 66.3 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — making the Core i7-13700HX the 115.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $485-73% | $1799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+272% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













