Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max 385

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max 385 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700HX

16 / 24

32,157

0.0%

32,274

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max 385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max 385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700HX

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (32,157 vs 32,274).
❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen AI Max 385.

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-13700HX.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max 385 better than Core i7-13700HX?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max 385 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max 385 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Ryzen AI Max 385 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $485 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-13700HX only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max 385 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/24. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max 385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700HX

The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 385.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	32,157	32,274
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	14,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13700HX versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385).

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
Socket	FCBGA1964	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	LPDDR5x-8000+67%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 385). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i7-13700HX) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	—	High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700HX was priced at $485, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($485 vs $0), Ryzen AI Max 385 was $485 cheaper.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max 385
MSRP	$485	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	66.3	—
Release Date	2023	2025

Search Core i7-13700HX on Amazon

Search Ryzen AI Max 385 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.