Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel

Core i9-13900KF

24 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2022
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······

Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900KF

2022

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 41.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 96.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • 82.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
  • 20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,743).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 96.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900KF better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Yes. Core i9-13900KF is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 157.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900KF is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900KF is the stronger fit. You are getting 157.4% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-13900KF is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900KF comes in 82.1% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 41.4% better value on MSRP (96.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, Ryzen 7 3700X can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900KF makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900KF vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i9-13900KF

The Core i9-13900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 253 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,743 points. Launch price was $564.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900KF packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900KF has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the Core i9-13900KF versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 25.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KF (base: 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-13900KF uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KF scores 57,743 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 88.1% lead for the Core i9-13900KF. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KF vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureCore i9-13900KFRyzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads
24 / 32+200%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.7 GHz+30%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
3.6 GHz+20%
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)+13%
32 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
512K (per core)+25500%
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
57,743+157%
22,430
Cinebench R23 Multi
39,565
Geekbench 6 Single
2,946
Geekbench 6 Multi
19,878
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KF versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Core i9-13900KF supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-13900KF supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KF) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel Z690 (Core i9-13900KF) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

FeatureCore i9-13900KFRyzen 7 3700X
Socket
LGA1700
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+75%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+50%
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
24+20%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i9-13900KF) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Core i9-13900KF targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i9-13900KFRyzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900KF was priced at $599, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($599 vs $329), Ryzen 7 3700X was $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900KF delivers 96.4 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Core i9-13900KF the 34.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-13900KFRyzen 7 3700X
MSRP
$599
$329-45%
Performance per Dollar
96.4+41%
68.2
Release Date
2022
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.