Core i9-13900KS
EPYC 4584PX
Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 4584PX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 4584PX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 4584PX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900KS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $818 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 118.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.6 vs 39.7 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,517 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4584PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4584PX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 150W vs 120W.
EPYC 4584PX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 150W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (60,169 vs 60,543).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 86.6 PassMark/$ ($1,517 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4584PX better than Core i9-13900KS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 4584PX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-13900KS
The Core i9-13900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,543 points. Launch price was $699.
EPYC 4584PX
The EPYC 4584PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 60,169 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900KS packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 4584PX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i9-13900KS has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-13900KS versus 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4584PX — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i9-13900KS uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4584PX uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KS scores 60,543 against the EPYC 4584PX's 60,169 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i9-13900KS. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KS vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4584PX.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 32+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.8 GHz+2% | 5.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 60,543 | 60,169 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 40,998 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,123 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 21,421 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4584PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KS versus 5200 on the EPYC 4584PX — the Core i9-13900KS supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4584PX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KS) vs 28 (EPYC 4584PX) — the EPYC 4584PX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900KS) and AM5 (EPYC 4584PX).
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+8% | 5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4584PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-13900KS) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4584PX). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i9-13900KS) and AMD Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4584PX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 4584PX rivals Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-13900KS was priced at $699, while the EPYC 4584PX came in at $1517. On launch pricing ($699 vs $1517), Core i9-13900KS was $818 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900KS delivers 86.6 pts/$ vs 39.7 pts/$ for the EPYC 4584PX — making the Core i9-13900KS the 74.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-13900KS | EPYC 4584PX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-54% | $1517 |
| Performance per Dollar | 86.6+118% | 39.7 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-13900KS and EPYC 4584PX
