Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 7513

Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 7513 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900KS

24 / 32

60,543

+1.3%

59,745

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Ryzen 9 5950X

Ryzen 9 9850HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 7513 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 7513: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900KS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,141 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
✅Delivers 311.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 86.6 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $2,840 MSRP).
✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7513, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7513

2021

Why buy it

✅+255.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 36 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900KS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (59,745 vs 60,543).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 86.6 PassMark/$ ($2,840 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900KS moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900KS better than EPYC 7513?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7513 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900KS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900KS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 30.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900KS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900KS is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900KS comes in $2,141 cheaper on MSRP at $699 MSRP versus $2,840 MSRP, and it still gives you a 30.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 311.7% better value on MSRP (86.6 vs 21.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900KS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 32 threads instead of 32/64. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900KS vs EPYC 7513 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900KS

The Core i9-13900KS is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.8 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 60,543 points. Launch price was $699.

EPYC 7513

The EPYC 7513 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.65 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 59,745 points. Launch price was $2,840.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900KS packs 24 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7513 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7513 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.8 GHz on the Core i9-13900KS versus 3.65 GHz on the EPYC 7513 — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900KS (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i9-13900KS uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7513 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900KS scores 60,543 against the EPYC 7513's 59,745 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i9-13900KS. L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900KS vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7513.

Feature	Core i9-13900KS	EPYC 7513
Cores / Threads	24 / 32	32 / 64+33%
Boost Clock	5.8 GHz+59%	3.65 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+23%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+256%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm+
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	60,543+1%	59,745
Cinebench R23 Multi	40,998	—
Geekbench 6 Single	3,123	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	21,421	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900KS uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7513 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-13900KS versus 3200 on the EPYC 7513 — the Core i9-13900KS supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7513 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-13900KS) vs 8 (EPYC 7513). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-13900KS) vs 128 (EPYC 7513) — the EPYC 7513 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i9-13900KS) and SP3 (EPYC 7513).

Feature	Core i9-13900KS	EPYC 7513
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+75%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-13900KS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i9-13900KS) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7513). The Core i9-13900KS includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7513 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i9-13900KS rivals Ryzen 9 7950X; EPYC 7513 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	Core i9-13900KS	EPYC 7513
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-13900KS was priced at $699, while the EPYC 7513 came in at $2840. On launch pricing ($699 vs $2840), Core i9-13900KS was $2141 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-13900KS delivers 86.6 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 7513 — making the Core i9-13900KS the 121.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-13900KS	EPYC 7513
MSRP	$699-75%	$2840
Performance per Dollar	86.6+312%	21.0
Release Date	2023	2021

Search Core i9-13900KS on Amazon

Search EPYC 7513 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.