
Core i9-7980XE
Popular choices:

Core i9-9980XE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-7980XE
2017Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980XE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$1,979 MSRP
Core i9-9980XE
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($1,979 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,127 vs 29,634).
Core i9-7980XE
2017Core i9-9980XE
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.7% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($1,979 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980XE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$1,979 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (29,127 vs 29,634).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-7980XE better than Core i9-9980XE?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-7980XE | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-7980XE | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 355 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 321 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 411 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 192 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-7980XE | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 636 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 480 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 645 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 659 FPS |
| high | 432 FPS | 624 FPS |
| ultra | 377 FPS | 554 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 431 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 319 FPS | 371 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 306 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-7980XE | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 741 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 741 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 697 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 679 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 741 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 680 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 578 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 501 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 532 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 365 FPS | 409 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-7980XE and Core i9-9980XE

Core i9-7980XE
Core i9-7980XE
The Core i9-7980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 29,634 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Core i9-9980XE
Core i9-9980XE
The Core i9-9980XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 29,127 points. Launch price was $1,979.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-7980XE and Core i9-9980XE share an identical 18-core/36-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7980XE versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9980XE — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-9980XE (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). Both are built on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i9-7980XE scores 29,634 against the Core i9-9980XE's 29,127 — a 1.7% lead for the Core i9-7980XE. Both processors carry 24.75 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i9-7980XE | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 18 / 36 | 18 / 36 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 24.75 MB (total) | 24.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 29,634+2% | 29,127 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,177 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2066 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 44 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i9-7980XE | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 44 | 44 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Core i9-7980XE targets Workstation, Core i9-9980XE targets HEDT / Workstation / Content Creation. Direct competitor: Core i9-9980XE rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2950X.
| Feature | Core i9-7980XE | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | HEDT / Workstation / Content Creation |
Value Analysis
The Core i9-7980XE launched at $1999 MSRP, while the Core i9-9980XE debuted at $1979. On MSRP ($1999 vs $1979), the Core i9-9980XE is $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-7980XE delivers 14.8 pts/$ vs 14.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-9980XE — making the Core i9-7980XE the 0.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-7980XE | Core i9-9980XE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1999 | $1979-1% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.8 | 14.7 |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













