Core i9-9880H vs Xeon E5-2695 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-9880H vs Xeon E5-2695 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-9880H vs Xeon E5-2695 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-9880H

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v2, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Xeon E5-2695 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9880H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,380 vs 13,531).
❌155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-9880H better than Xeon E5-2695 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2695 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-9880H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-9880H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9880H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-9880H still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-9880H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-9880H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 12/24. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-9880H vs Xeon E5-2695 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9880H

The Core i9-9880H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,531 points. Launch price was $556.

Xeon E5-2695 v2

The Xeon E5-2695 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 13,380 points. Launch price was $1,950.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-9880H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v2 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-9880H versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v2 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i9-9880H (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i9-9880H uses the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9880H scores 13,531 against the Xeon E5-2695 v2's 13,380 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i9-9880H. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9880H vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2695 v2.

Feature	Core i9-9880H	Xeon E5-2695 v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+50%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz	2.4 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	30 MB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-HR (2019)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	13,531+1%	13,380

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-9880H uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.