Core M-5Y31
VS
Celeron G1850

Core M-5Y31 vs Celeron G1850

Intel

Core M-5Y31

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron G1850

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core M-5Y31 is positioned at rank 1166 and the Celeron G1850 is on rank 450, so the Celeron G1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y31

#1153
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4327%
#1154
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4264%
#1155
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3914%
#1156
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3897%
#1157
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3861%
#1159
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3729%
#1160
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3575%
#1161
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3569%
#1162
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3473%
#1165
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1166
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
100%
#1167
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1169
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1170
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1171
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1172
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1173
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
98%
#1175
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
96%
#1176
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1177
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
95%
#1179
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
95%
#1180
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1850

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6866%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6488%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4711%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1419%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1124%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
983%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
563%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
556%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
506%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
506%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
500%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
487%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
480%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
478%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
474%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
99%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
99%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
99%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
99%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
99%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
98%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
98%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
100%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
100%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
99%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
99%
#463
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G1850 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core M-5Y31 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore M-5Y31Celeron G1850
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron G1850 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($30 vs $30) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore M-5Y31Celeron G1850
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+0%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core M-5Y31 and Celeron G1850

Intel

Core M-5Y31

The Core M-5Y31 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,905 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G1850

The Celeron G1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,907 points. Launch price was $101.

Processing Power

The Core M-5Y31 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G1850's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core M-5Y31 versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G1850 — a 18.9% clock advantage for the Celeron G1850 (base: 0.9 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core M-5Y31 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G1850 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y31 scores 1,905 against the Celeron G1850's 1,907 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1850. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y31 vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1850.

FeatureCore M-5Y31Celeron G1850
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz+21%
Base Clock
0.9 GHz
2.9 GHz+222%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-36%
22 nm
Architecture
Broadwell-Y (2014)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,905
1,907
Geekbench 6 Single
543
Geekbench 6 Multi
945
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core M-5Y31 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1850 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore M-5Y31Celeron G1850
Socket
FCBGA1234
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core M-5Y31) / VT-x (Celeron G1850). The Celeron G1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Core M-5Y31 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1850 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1850 rivals Pentium G3258.

FeatureCore M-5Y31Celeron G1850
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Core M-5Y31 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Celeron G1850 debuted at $42. At current prices ($30 vs $30), the Celeron G1850 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core M-5Y31 delivers 63.5 pts/$ vs 63.6 pts/$ for the Celeron G1850 — making the Celeron G1850 the 0.1% better value option.

FeatureCore M-5Y31Celeron G1850
MSRP
$281
$42-85%
Avg Price (30d)
$30
$30
Performance per Dollar
63.5
63.6
Release Date
2014
2014