Core m3-8100Y vs A10-5700
Core m3-8100Y
A10-5700
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m3-8100Y is positioned at rank 383 and the A10-5700 is on rank 448, so the Core m3-8100Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m3-8100Y
Performance Per Dollar A10-5700
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m3-8100Y | A10-5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m3-8100Y | A10-5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-8100Y and A10-5700
Core m3-8100Y
The Core m3-8100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,767 points. Launch price was $281.
A10-5700
The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.
Processing Power
The Core m3-8100Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-5700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core m3-8100Y versus 4 GHz on the A10-5700 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core m3-8100Y uses the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the A10-5700 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-8100Y scores 2,767 against the A10-5700's 2,747 — a 0.7% lead for the Core m3-8100Y. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-8100Y vs 0 kB on the A10-5700.
| Feature | Core m3-8100Y | A10-5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 1.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz+209% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,767 | 2,747 |
Memory & Platform
The Core m3-8100Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-5700 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m3-8100Y | A10-5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | FM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core m3-8100Y) / true (A10-5700). The A10-5700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Core m3-8100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.
| Feature | Core m3-8100Y | A10-5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon HD 7660D |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core m3-8100Y and A10-5700
