Core m3-8100Y
VS
Processor N250

Core m3-8100Y vs Processor N250

Intel

Core m3-8100Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2018
VS
Intel

Processor N250

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core m3-8100Y is positioned at rank #383 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-8100Y

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
98%
#371
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
530%
#372
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
522%
#373
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
480%
#374
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
477%
#375
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
473%
#377
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
457%
#378
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
438%
#379
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
437%
#380
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
426%
#383
Core m3-8100Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#391
Core i5-1145GRE
MSRP: $362|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Processor N250 (2025) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore m3-8100YProcessor N250
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Twin Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core m3-8100Y (2018) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore m3-8100YProcessor N250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-8100Y and Processor N250

Intel

Core m3-8100Y

The Core m3-8100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,767 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Processor N250

The Processor N250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,786 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core m3-8100Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Processor N250 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Processor N250 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core m3-8100Y versus 3.8 GHz on the Processor N250 — a 11.1% clock advantage for the Processor N250 (base: 1.1 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core m3-8100Y uses the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture (14 nm), while the Processor N250 uses Twin Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-8100Y scores 2,767 against the Processor N250's 2,786 — a 0.7% lead for the Processor N250. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-8100Y vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N250.

FeatureCore m3-8100YProcessor N250
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz+1000%
0.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB (total)+300%
Process
14 nm
10 nm-29%
Architecture
Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
Twin Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark
2,767
2,786
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-8100Y uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N250 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore m3-8100YProcessor N250
Socket
FCBGA1515
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%