Celeron G5905 vs Core m3-8100Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5905 vs Core m3-8100Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5905 vs Core m3-8100Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5905

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 58W instead of 512W, a 454W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Core m3-8100Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,760 vs 2,767).

Core m3-8100Y

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌782.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 58W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5905 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-8100Y better than Celeron G5905?

Yes. Core m3-8100Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core m3-8100Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-8100Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-8100Y still makes the most sense overall. Core m3-8100Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5905 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5905 vs Core m3-8100Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5905

The Celeron G5905 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,760 points. Launch price was $69.

Core m3-8100Y

The Core m3-8100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,767 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5905 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-8100Y's 2 cores. The Core m3-8100Y is built on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5905 scores 2,760 against the Core m3-8100Y's 2,767 — a 0.3% lead for the Core m3-8100Y. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905 vs 4 MB on the Core m3-8100Y.

Feature	Celeron G5905	Core m3-8100Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	—	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+218%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache	4 MB
L2 Cache	—	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	—	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,760	2,767
Geekbench 6 Single	724	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,242	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5905 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core m3-8100Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G5905	Core m3-8100Y
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5905) / not specified (Core m3-8100Y). The Celeron G5905 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core m3-8100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.