Celeron G5905 vs Core i3-6157U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5905 vs Core i3-6157U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5905 vs Core i3-6157U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5905

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 58W instead of 512W, a 454W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,760 vs 2,782).

Core i3-6157U

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌782.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 58W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-6157U better than Celeron G5905?

Yes. Core i3-6157U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-6157U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 37 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-6157U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-6157U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-6157U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 37 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5905 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2016) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5905 vs Core i3-6157U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5905

The Celeron G5905 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,760 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-6157U

The Core i3-6157U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5905 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-6157U's 2 cores. The Core i3-6157U is built on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5905 scores 2,760 against the Core i3-6157U's 2,782 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-6157U. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-6157U.

Feature	Celeron G5905	Core i3-6157U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	—	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+46%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	—	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	—	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,760	2,782
Geekbench 6 Single	724	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,242	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5905 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-6157U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5905 versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-6157U — the Celeron G5905 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5905 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5905) vs 12 (Core i3-6157U) — the Celeron G5905 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Celeron G5905	Core i3-6157U
Socket	LGA1200	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+25%	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+300%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5905) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-6157U). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5905) and Iris Graphics 550 (Core i3-6157U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905 targets Budget, Core i3-6157U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.