Celeron G5905 vs Xeon L3426

Intel

Celeron G5905

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WW2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon L3426

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G5905 vs Xeon L3426 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5905 vs Xeon L3426 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5905 vs Xeon L3426: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5905

2020

Why buy it

  • +0.7% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while Xeon L3426 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon L3426 across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon L3426, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
  • 28.9% higher power demand at 58W vs 45W.

Xeon L3426

2009

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 38 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
  • Draws 45W instead of 58W, a 13W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,742 vs 2,760).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5905 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5905 better than Xeon L3426?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon L3426 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G5905 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5905 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Celeron G5905 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron G5905 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G5905 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5905 vs Xeon L3426 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G5905

The Celeron G5905 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,760 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon L3426

The Xeon L3426 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,742 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Celeron G5905 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon L3426 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon L3426 has 2 more cores. In PassMark, the Celeron G5905 scores 2,760 against the Xeon L3426's 2,742 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G5905. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5905 vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon L3426.

FeatureCeleron G5905Xeon L3426
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz+88%
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
8 MB Intel® Smart Cache+100%
Process
14 nm-69%
45 nm
PassMark
2,760
2,742
Geekbench 6 Single
724
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,242
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5905 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L3426 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G5905Xeon L3426
Socket
LGA1200
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5905) / not specified (Xeon L3426). The Celeron G5905 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon L3426 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5905 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5905 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.

FeatureCeleron G5905Xeon L3426
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget