Celeron G6900TE vs Core m3-8100Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core m3-8100Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core m3-8100Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1515 and older memory support.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 710, while Core m3-8100Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $53 MSRP, while Core m3-8100Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core m3-8100Y

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G6900TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,767 vs 2,782).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA1515, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900TE better than Core m3-8100Y?

Yes. Celeron G6900TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G6900TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $53 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA1515, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900TE vs Core m3-8100Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Core m3-8100Y

The Core m3-8100Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,767 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core m3-8100Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 3.4 GHz on the Core m3-8100Y — a 34.5% clock advantage for the Core m3-8100Y (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core m3-8100Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Core m3-8100Y's 2,767 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G6900TE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE vs 4 MB on the Core m3-8100Y.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core m3-8100Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.4 GHz+42%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+118%	1.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,782	2,767
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core m3-8100Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Core m3-8100Y
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) / not specified (Core m3-8100Y). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Core m3-8100Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.