PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5925 vs Celeron G6900TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5925 vs Celeron G6900TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5925

2020

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (756 vs 1,400).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,248 vs 2,457).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 45.3 vs 52.5 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌65.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+85.2% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $9 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.5 vs 45.3 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 58W, a 23W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900TE better than Celeron G5925?

Yes. Celeron G6900TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 96.9% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G6900TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 96.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900TE comes in $9 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 15.9% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 45.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Celeron G5925 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G5925 vs Celeron G6900TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5925

The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G5925 and Celeron G6900TE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron G6900TE is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5925 scores 2,808 against the Celeron G6900TE's 2,782 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron G5925. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 756 vs 1,400, a 59.7% lead for the Celeron G6900TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,248 vs 2,457 (65.3% advantage for the Celeron G6900TE). L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5925 vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Celeron G6900TE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+50%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	—	Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark	2,808	2,782
Geekbench 6 Single	756	1,400+85%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	2,457+97%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5925 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G6900TE uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5925 versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900TE — the Celeron G6900TE supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5925) vs 20 (Celeron G6900TE) — the Celeron G6900TE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5925) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900TE).

Feature	Celeron G5925	Celeron G6900TE
Socket	LGA1200	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-4800+80%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5925) and UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5925 targets Budget, Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Celeron G6900TE
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	UHD Graphics 710
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5925 was priced at $62, while the Celeron G6900TE came in at $53. On launch pricing ($62 vs $53), Celeron G6900TE was $9 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5925 delivers 45.3 pts/$ vs 52.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G6900TE — making the Celeron G6900TE the 14.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Celeron G6900TE
MSRP	$62	$53-15%
Performance per Dollar	45.3	52.5+16%
Release Date	2020	2022

Search Celeron G5925 on Amazon

Search Celeron G6900TE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.