PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i7-3520M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i7-3520M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5925

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $284 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $346 MSRP).
✅Delivers 451.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.3 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $346 MSRP).
✅Draws 58W instead of 512W, a 454W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,808 vs 2,842).

Core i7-3520M

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.2 vs 45.3 PassMark/$ ($346 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
❌782.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 58W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3520M better than Celeron G5925?

Yes. Core i7-3520M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3520M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3520M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3520M is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-3520M comes in 458.1% more expensive on MSRP at $346 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5925 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,808 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5925 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i7-3520M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5925

The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-3520M

The Core i7-3520M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,842 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5925 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-3520M's 2 cores. The Core i7-3520M is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5925 scores 2,808 against the Core i7-3520M's 2,842 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-3520M. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5925 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3520M.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i7-3520M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	—	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+24%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	—	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,808	2,842+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	756	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5925 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3520M uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5925 versus 1600 on the Core i7-3520M — the Celeron G5925 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5925 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5925) and HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3520M).

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i7-3520M
Socket	LGA1200	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+67%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+300%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5925) vs true (Core i7-3520M). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5925) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3520M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; Core i7-3520M rivals AMD A10-5750M.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i7-3520M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5925 was priced at $62, while the Core i7-3520M came in at $346. On launch pricing ($62 vs $346), Celeron G5925 was $284 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5925 delivers 45.3 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-3520M — making the Celeron G5925 the 138.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i7-3520M
MSRP	$62-82%	$346
Performance per Dollar	45.3+452%	8.2
Release Date	2020	2012

Search Celeron G5925 on Amazon

Search Core i7-3520M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.