PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-4200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-4200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5925

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $163 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Delivers 262.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.3 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
✅Draws 58W instead of 512W, a 454W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,808 vs 2,809).

Core i5-4200M

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.5 vs 45.3 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
❌782.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 58W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4200M better than Celeron G5925?

Yes. Core i5-4200M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4200M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4200M is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i5-4200M comes in 262.9% more expensive on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5925 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,808 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5925 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-4200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5925

The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4200M

The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5925 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4200M's 2 cores. The Core i5-4200M is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5925 scores 2,808 against the Core i5-4200M's 2,809 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-4200M. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5925 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-4200M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	—	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+44%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	—	512 kB
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	—	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,808	2,809
Geekbench 6 Single	756	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5925 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4200M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5925 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4200M — the Celeron G5925 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5925 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-4200M
Socket	LGA1200	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+67%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+300%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5925) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5925) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4200M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5925 targets Budget, Core i5-4200M targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-4200M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5925 was priced at $62, while the Core i5-4200M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($62 vs $225), Celeron G5925 was $163 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5925 delivers 45.3 pts/$ vs 12.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-4200M — making the Celeron G5925 the 113.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-4200M
MSRP	$62-72%	$225
Performance per Dollar	45.3+262%	12.5
Release Date	2020	2013

Search Celeron G5925 on Amazon

Search Core i5-4200M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.