Celeron G5925 vs FX-8800P

Intel

Celeron G5925

2 Cores2 Thrd58 WW2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

FX-8800P

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015
Similar parts
·······

Celeron G5925 vs FX-8800P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5925 vs FX-8800P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5925 vs FX-8800P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5925

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $88 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 139.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.3 vs 18.9 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 610, while FX-8800P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,808 vs 2,833).
  • 286.7% higher power demand at 58W vs 15W.

FX-8800P

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 58W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.9 vs 45.3 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5925 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8800P better than Celeron G5925?
Yes. FX-8800P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, FX-8800P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8800P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
FX-8800P is still the better call for a fresh build. FX-8800P comes in 141.9% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5925 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,808 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G5925 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2015). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5925 vs FX-8800P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron G5925

The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

FX-8800P

The FX-8800P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,833 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron G5925 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the FX-8800P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-8800P has 2 more cores. The FX-8800P is built on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5925 scores 2,808 against the FX-8800P's 2,833 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-8800P.

FeatureCeleron G5925FX-8800P
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+71%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
2048 kB
Process
14 nm-50%
28 nm
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
2,808
2,833
Geekbench 6 Single
756
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,248
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5925 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8800P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G5925FX-8800P
Socket
LGA1200
FP4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G5925) / not specified (FX-8800P). The Celeron G5925 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the FX-8800P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.

FeatureCeleron G5925FX-8800P
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5925 was priced at $62, while the FX-8800P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($62 vs $150), Celeron G5925 was $88 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5925 delivers 45.3 pts/$ vs 18.9 pts/$ for the FX-8800P — making the Celeron G5925 the 82.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron G5925FX-8800P
MSRP
$62-59%
$150
Performance per Dollar
45.3+140%
18.9
Release Date
2020
2015

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.