PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-4278U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-4278U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5925

2020

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 58W instead of 512W, a 454W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (756 vs 889).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,248 vs 1,860).
❌Launch MSRP is still $62 MSRP, while Core i5-4278U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4278U

2014

Why buy it

✅+17.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌782.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 58W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4278U better than Celeron G5925?

Yes. Core i5-4278U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 49% better Geekbench multi-core, and 0.6% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4278U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4278U is the stronger fit. You are getting 49% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4278U is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i5-4278U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G5925 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 2,808 PassMark with 2 cores and 2 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5925 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G5925 vs Core i5-4278U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5925

The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-4278U

The Core i5-4278U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,826 points. Launch price was $315.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G5925 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4278U's 2 cores. The Core i5-4278U is built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5925 scores 2,808 against the Core i5-4278U's 2,826 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-4278U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 756 vs 889, a 16.2% lead for the Core i5-4278U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,248 vs 1,860 (39.4% advantage for the Core i5-4278U). L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5925 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4278U.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-4278U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	—	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+38%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	—	512 kB
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	—	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,808	2,826
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,688
Geekbench 6 Single	756	889+18%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	1,860+49%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5925 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4278U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5925 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4278U — the Celeron G5925 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5925 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5925) vs 12 (Core i5-4278U) — the Celeron G5925 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5925) and Intel HM86,Intel HM87,Intel QM87 (Core i5-4278U).

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core i5-4278U
Socket	LGA1200	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+67%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+700%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5925) vs true (Core i5-4278U). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G5925) and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 (Core i5-4278U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405.