PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G5925 vs Core 2 Duo P8700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G5925 vs Core 2 Duo P8700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G5925

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($62 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
✅Delivers 289.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 45.3 vs 11.6 PassMark/$ ($62 MSRP vs $241 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌1833.3% higher power demand at 58W vs 3W.

Core 2 Duo P8700

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 3W instead of 58W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G5925 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,805 vs 2,808).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.6 vs 45.3 PassMark/$ ($241 MSRP vs $62 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G5925 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G5925 better than Core 2 Duo P8700?

Yes. Celeron G5925 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G5925 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G5925 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G5925 is the better buy right now. Celeron G5925 comes in $179 cheaper on MSRP at $62 MSRP versus $241 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 289.1% better value on MSRP (45.3 vs 11.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G5925 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2009), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G5925 vs Core 2 Duo P8700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G5925

The Celeron G5925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 58 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 2,808 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo P8700

The Core 2 Duo P8700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,805 points. Launch price was $209.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G5925 and Core 2 Duo P8700 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Core 2 Duo P8700 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G5925 scores 2,808 against the Core 2 Duo P8700's 2,805 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G5925. L3 cache: 4 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Celeron G5925 vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P8700.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core 2 Duo P8700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	—	2.53 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+42%	2.53 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB Intel® Smart Cache+33%	3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	—	3 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	—	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	2,808	2,805
Geekbench 6 Single	756	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,248	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G5925 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Celeron G5925 versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo P8700 — the Celeron G5925 supports 150.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G5925 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G5925) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo P8700) — the Celeron G5925 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Celeron G5925) and GM45,GS45,PM45 (Core 2 Duo P8700).

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core 2 Duo P8700
Socket	LGA1200	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+150%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+1500%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G5925) vs true (Core 2 Duo P8700). The Celeron G5925 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Core 2 Duo P8700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G5925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G5925 rivals Pentium Gold G6405; Core 2 Duo P8700 rivals Turion II Ultra M600.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core 2 Duo P8700
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 610	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G5925 was priced at $62, while the Core 2 Duo P8700 came in at $241. On launch pricing ($62 vs $241), Celeron G5925 was $179 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G5925 delivers 45.3 pts/$ vs 11.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo P8700 — making the Celeron G5925 the 118.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G5925	Core 2 Duo P8700
MSRP	$62-74%	$241
Performance per Dollar	45.3+291%	11.6
Release Date	2020	2009

Search Celeron G5925 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo P8700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.