Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X3440

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X3440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X3440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $162 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
✅Delivers 307.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.5 vs 12.9 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1156 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3440 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X3440, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.

Xeon X3440

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,769 vs 2,782).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.9 vs 52.5 PassMark/$ ($215 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1156, while Celeron G6900TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G6900TE better than Xeon X3440?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3440 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron G6900TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G6900TE is the better buy right now. Celeron G6900TE comes in $162 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $215 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon X3440 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 307.6% better value on MSRP (52.5 vs 12.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2009), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1156, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/8. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900TE vs Xeon X3440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900TE

The Celeron G6900TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 2,782 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon X3440

The Xeon X3440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 2.93 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 2,769 points. Launch price was $215.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900TE packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Xeon X3440 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon X3440 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G6900TE versus 2.93 GHz on the Xeon X3440 — a 19.9% clock advantage for the Xeon X3440 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Celeron G6900TE uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon X3440 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900TE scores 2,782 against the Xeon X3440's 2,769 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron G6900TE. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900TE vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon X3440.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Xeon X3440
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.93 GHz+22%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.53 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-78%	45 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	2,782	2,769
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,457	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon X3440 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Xeon X3440
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+150%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G6900TE) / not specified (Xeon X3440). The Celeron G6900TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 710), while the Xeon X3440 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900TE rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Xeon X3440
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900TE was priced at $53, while the Xeon X3440 came in at $215. On launch pricing ($53 vs $215), Celeron G6900TE was $162 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900TE delivers 52.5 pts/$ vs 12.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X3440 — making the Celeron G6900TE the 121.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900TE	Xeon X3440
MSRP	$53-75%	$215
Performance per Dollar	52.5+307%	12.9
Release Date	2022	2009

Search Celeron G6900TE on Amazon

Search Xeon X3440 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.